Fluid dynamics

Renault & Alpine General Discussion

Moderators: eastlmark, BIG_MVS, phildini, Test Moderator, Alpineandy

User avatar
User

simontaylor

Rank

Non Member

Posts

5602

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:33 pm

Location

Fleet, Hampshire


Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Fluid dynamics

Postby simontaylor » Wed Jun 09, 2010 10:39 pm

Anyone here an expert or have a degree in the subject?

I am wishing to understand how effective a sworl pot is, how it seperates bubbles from fluid and the effectiveness of then being drwn into the centre of the vortex for expulson from the fluid?
1986 : '86 GTA v6 BW-EFR turbo, with Adaptronic ECU
Firsts at
2007 : Gurston Down & RAOC Champion
2008 : Rushmoor & Eelmoor & ACSMC Hillclimb class Champion
2009 : Longcross & Eelmoor
2010 : Crystal Palace & Eelmoor
2016 : Rushmoor & 5th O/A
User avatar
User

Tony Smith

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1407

Joined

Fri Apr 16, 2004 4:50 pm

Location

Kent


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Hmmm

Postby Tony Smith » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:08 pm

Get a F**king life man!!!
Alpines - GTA 3.0 Turbo, GTA 3.0 Inj (Project DD), GTA 6.2 V8 (500 bhp) , R32 Skyline GTR, BMW Alpina B10 635 Highline, Alpina B10 E39 5 Series, Jaguar 4.2 XKR, Laguna 205GT, BMW 120d.
no avatar
User

MFaulks

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1552

Joined

Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:25 pm


Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 26 times

Postby MFaulks » Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:38 pm

I had some stuff on this, will have a look, believe some SAE articles on it. Had a chap at work doing CFD analysis will ask. However, can't you do it practically, and just monitor rad and engine temps in and out, and test with a pot and without - simply is there any change or nowt taken out?
... A diamond is only a piece of coal that did well under pressure... PRV afflicted, may be I need to squeeze harder!!!!

https://www.facebook.com/maftecfaulks
User avatar
User

Stunned Monkey

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1514

Joined

Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:24 am

Location

Nr Chippenham, Wiltshire


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Postby Stunned Monkey » Fri Jun 11, 2010 6:57 pm

Similar principle to a static fluid with bubbles in, the bubbles rise to the top because they're less dense. Make a fluid spin and any gas will move to the centre and the fluid to the outside. How fast it spins will dictate how effective this is - think of it being like G-force. In a static container, the G force is 1 straight down. Spin it fast enough and your fluid will experience multiple G radially.
Martin - PRV Tinkerererer
www.delorean.co.uk
User avatar
User

simonsays74

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1296

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 10:12 pm

Location

Belfast (££££ Zone!!)


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby simonsays74 » Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:09 pm

Stunned Monkey wrote:Similar principle to a static fluid with bubbles in, the bubbles rise to the top because they're less dense. Make a fluid spin and any gas will move to the centre and the fluid to the outside. How fast it spins will dictate how effective this is - think of it being like G-force. In a static container, the G force is 1 straight down. Spin it fast enough and your fluid will experience multiple G radially.


Boy, I'm I glad I read that $hite! :lol:
no avatar
User

MFaulks

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1552

Joined

Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:25 pm


Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 26 times

Postby MFaulks » Sat Jun 12, 2010 8:43 am

Stunned Monkey wrote:Similar principle to a static fluid with bubbles in, the bubbles rise to the top because they're less dense. Make a fluid spin and any gas will move to the centre and the fluid to the outside. How fast it spins will dictate how effective this is - think of it being like G-force. In a static container, the G force is 1 straight down. Spin it fast enough and your fluid will experience multiple G radially.


centripetal force - get it right, thought you were doing a degree??? :lol:

bubbles get squeezed out, and the water will naturally form a vortex, with offset flow, and especially disappearing down an 'ole... I'm sure you were good at playing in the bath when you were young :wink:
... A diamond is only a piece of coal that did well under pressure... PRV afflicted, may be I need to squeeze harder!!!!

https://www.facebook.com/maftecfaulks
User avatar
User

Miles

Rank

Non Member

Posts

725

Joined

Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:06 am

Location

Hampshire


Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Good question

Postby Miles » Sat Jun 12, 2010 9:17 am

Good question Simon and one that needs answering,
i'm sure the swirl pot puts air in.
Seems strange how i always have to bleed my system with no loss of fluid.
User avatar
User

simontaylor

Rank

Non Member

Posts

5602

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:33 pm

Location

Fleet, Hampshire


Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Postby simontaylor » Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:08 pm

Martin, and as we live, and drive, in the Northern Hemisphere, which direction does the water need to swirl so that we get the best effect of seperation etc?
1986 : '86 GTA v6 BW-EFR turbo, with Adaptronic ECU
Firsts at
2007 : Gurston Down & RAOC Champion
2008 : Rushmoor & Eelmoor & ACSMC Hillclimb class Champion
2009 : Longcross & Eelmoor
2010 : Crystal Palace & Eelmoor
2016 : Rushmoor & 5th O/A


  • Advertisement

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 170 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | Renault' and 'Alpine' are trademarks of Renault S.A.S. or its subsidiaries and are used with kind permission of Renault France