How accurate is your speedo ?

Renault & Alpine General Discussion

Moderators: eastlmark, BIG_MVS, phildini, Test Moderator, Alpineandy

User avatar
User

turbodog

Rank

Non Member

Posts

488

Joined

Wed May 05, 2004 5:57 pm

Location

NORTH WALES


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 13 times

How accurate is your speedo ?

Postby turbodog » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:10 am

On my way to the North west meeting on Sunday, I tried out my new toy, a TomTom sat nav, and was quite taken aback as to how innaccurate my speedo was.
Over the entire speed range, it was 10% out, so when I thought i was doing 70mph I was was in fact doing 77mph. I tried various speeds, and it was exactly 10%.
My car runs on 17" Azev wheels at the rear fitted with 265/40/17. If you have the larger wheels on your car, makes you wonder how accurate is your speedo .....? :shock:

Andrew
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:29 am

Yes it's not much kop .I noticed when I had the 17" on the rear comparing it with the Drivesmart
Mine is not wired up since I put the stds back on so I use the Drivefart ....but that couldn't find any satellites yesterday :?
no avatar
User

mav

Rank

Non Member

Posts

128

Joined

Mon Apr 19, 2004 2:01 pm

Location

morecambe


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby mav » Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:09 pm

http://www.carbibles.com/tyre_bible.html

If you go to page 2 of the link above about half way down.
There is a tyre calculator which will tell you how far out your speedo will be against the standard tyre. If you put larger tyres on.
User avatar
User

jonc

Rank

Non Member

Posts

382

Joined

Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:08 am

Location

Oxfordshire


Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Postby jonc » Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:33 pm

I was just having a look at this today using my Blackberry's GPS. Actually, with the 255/40/17's my speedo seems to be almost spot on. At lower speeds, when my speedo is just getting on for 30, I was doing 28mph on the GPS. At motorway speeds it seems almost bang on.

I have a feeling that the Toyo Proxes I'm using now were ever so slightly smaller than the ContiSport Contact rears (of the same dimensions) that I had previously. Certainly, there was more "width" on the Contis for the same nominal section. So, what tyre you've got on will make a slight difference - but I was pleasantly surprised at how accurate my speedo seems to be.

Turbodog, if you're running 265/40, those are going to be a bit larger diameter than the 255s, although only about 8mm!

Jon
User avatar
User

mellowyellowa610

Rank

Non Member

Posts

958

Joined

Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:02 pm

Location

Chester, Cheshire


Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Postby mellowyellowa610 » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:13 pm

I had the sat nav with me yesterday too and also saw roughly a 10% difference in speeds. I have to say though, you tend to find most vehicles have this difference, It isn't just the Alpine. Just looking again though my difference is the other way, so that when my speedo shows 77mph, I seem to be doing 70mph.
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:31 pm

So does that mean we can sue the manufacture if we get a ticket :?:
User avatar
User

si21

Rank

Non Member

Posts

2094

Joined

Mon May 09, 2005 8:24 pm

Location

S.E London


Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 2 times

My 21 Turbo on 17's

Postby si21 » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:35 pm

mellowyellowa610 wrote:I had the sat nav with me yesterday too and also saw roughly a 10% difference in speeds. I have to say though, you tend to find most vehicles have this difference, It isn't just the Alpine. Just looking again though my difference is the other way, so that when my speedo shows 77mph, I seem to be doing 70mph.


top wack with revs delimited by 500rpm increases top wack by 4 MPH on standard rubber up from 139mph standard. I have never checked sat nav against speedo on standard rims and rubber tho' :roll:

on 17's I have seen 151mph and sat nav varified at 149 thats not bad and having thought about that it seems realistically possible :wink:

Si21
User avatar
User

mellowyellowa610

Rank

Non Member

Posts

958

Joined

Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:02 pm

Location

Chester, Cheshire


Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Postby mellowyellowa610 » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:48 pm

Turbodog might indeed have a problem! The speedo speed is higher than the actual speed in the A610 which means if you stick to the cars speedo for limits you will be fine. Of course we own Alpine's so we do occasionally venture above the speed limit. :oops: I found out my Sat Nav only goes up to an actual of 126mph and won't go any further though!
Simon (A6 TEN) mentioned he'd seen an indicated 180mph on his 610!!

clee wrote:So does that mean we can sue the manufacture if we get a ticket :?:
no avatar
User

mav

Rank

Non Member

Posts

128

Joined

Mon Apr 19, 2004 2:01 pm

Location

morecambe


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby mav » Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:20 pm

I think you'll find there is a degree of variance in every speedo irrelevant of the make n model there fitted to i've found this with the majority of cars i have owned from ford's to porsches and usually found they over read except for the ford but only by the slightest of margins between 3-6% out can't quote on the alpine as the speedo is like an amnesia victim it knows it's there but dammed if it knows what to do!!!! so have to rely on the sat nav!
no avatar
User

Matt200

Rank

Club Member

Club Member
Posts

15

Joined

Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:53 pm


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby Matt200 » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:23 pm

My GTA with 17" Azev's is the same as turbodog's, it reads about 10% under against satnav, which is predictable because of the wheel size, all my other cars have been about 5% under.

Much better than the world of performance bikes though... there's nothing more fun than seeing the face of a pub-hero Hayabusa owner turning up at a timed top speed event seeing 210mph on his clocks and getting a 175mph timing ticket :lol:
User avatar
User

JohnC

Rank

Non Member

Posts

2120

Joined

Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:19 pm

Location

Jersey C.I.


Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Postby JohnC » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:09 pm

Just as a matter of interest, if you have an over reading speedo, just check to see if the speedo needle moves slightly when you switch on the ign.
1990 GTA Atmo, 2003 Jaguar X type 2.5SE Auto, 2018 Kia Picanto GT-Line-S 1.25
no avatar
User

turbo 5

Rank

Non Member

Posts

202

Joined

Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:07 pm

Location

Chepstow (near as damit!)


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby turbo 5 » Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:33 am

Just for reference, car manufacturers have to comply to a requirement that the speedo must not under read, but may over read by 10%. To meet the requirement most ere on the cautious side, so an indication of say 75mph really only equates to a true speed of 70mph.


  • Advertisement

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 257 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | Renault' and 'Alpine' are trademarks of Renault S.A.S. or its subsidiaries and are used with kind permission of Renault France