Moderators: eastlmark, BIG_MVS, phildini, Test Moderator, Alpineandy
Non Member
1514
Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:24 am
Nr Chippenham, Wiltshire
Non Member
3474
Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am
Colchester, Essex
Non Member
10431
Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am
Derbyshire
Non Member
3474
Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am
Colchester, Essex
clee wrote:No sign of the new sensor yet But I'm still not 100% convinced that's the problem .
I plonked the Adapt on for a few runs at Brunt ,logged them ,it was OK but the map is all wrong ( ) .Lots of rough running on a 0-60 ,wouldn't pickup at all but did produce slightly more on the power run ,I reckon that'd be down to running the bigger injectors more efficiently .
How sure are we about PG's timing ? I know he and his mech mate had issues with it .......................How's it running Richard ????
Non Member
10431
Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am
Derbyshire
David Gentleman wrote:Ah, another reason why your map won't be right, is because Peter's can ran much higher fuel pressure than you are..
You can't expect any of the map to be correct for your nigh on standard engine spec. Pete had the CC, bigger turbo, higher fuelpressure, more boost etc...
Non Member
3474
Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am
Colchester, Essex
clee wrote:David Gentleman wrote:Ah, another reason why your map won't be right, is because Peter's can ran much higher fuel pressure than you are..
You can't expect any of the map to be correct for your nigh on standard engine spec. Pete had the CC, bigger turbo, higher fuelpressure, more boost etc...
So about as much use as a choclit teapot
When I get a proper map sorted I'll pop it in the post ...............
Non Member
725
Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:06 am
Hampshire
Non Member
10431
Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am
Derbyshire
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 201 guests