clee wrote:You will have to get the CC inlet/outlet pointing vertical as Simon says .
heh, dont bring me into your fights!!!!!!!!!!
Moderators: eastlmark, BIG_MVS, phildini, Test Moderator, Alpineandy
Non Member
369
Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:16 pm
York,UK
Non Member
3474
Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am
Colchester, Essex
steveatyork wrote::evil: Still strugling Just wondering if the plumbing on the hoses sounds right
From the pump out - straight up to the exp tank (Which is higher then the rad and cc) out of the exp tank to the bottom of the rad, rad out top with the hose to the cc then the cc back to the pump
just had a couple of hrs trying to sort it with no luck, it seems to be getting a lot of air in the cc to pump hose
Non Member
725
Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:06 am
Hampshire
Non Member
3474
Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am
Colchester, Essex
Miles wrote:On my setup,
I had the pump pressure side plumbed straight into rad followed by charge cooler. Then into header tank back to pump. No problems bleeding. But as DG mentioned cold in furthest away from turbo.
Against airflow.
Non Member
1514
Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:24 am
Nr Chippenham, Wiltshire
David Gentleman wrote:That will work, but is not best because you actually have a header tank full of hot water instead of cold. I think Steve has it between the pump and rad as I can make out..
Non Member
3474
Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am
Colchester, Essex
David Gentleman wrote:That will work, but is not best because you actually have a header tank full of hot water instead of cold. I think Steve has it between the pump and rad as I can make out..
Stunned Monkey wrote:Extra surface area for cooling the water
I see your point about the air getting caught in the tank, but IMO the pump should always draw directly from the reservoir and pressurise both active components (rad and CC in that order) otherwise you're relying on gravity and/or the positive pressure sealed by the reservoir cap to circulate the coolant.
Stunned Monkey wrote:Why plumb up the CC so the coolest part is the "last" bit in terms of air flow? surely you want the hottest air to encounter the coolest part of the heat exchanger to provide the greatest temp gradient and the fastest cooling effect...
Stunned Monkey wrote:(then again, I reckon most of this discussion is fairly moot - you could probably plumb it together inside out and upside down and the measurable differences will be minimal - it'll still work bloody well.)
Non Member
5602
Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:33 pm
Fleet, Hampshire
Non Member
369
Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:16 pm
York,UK
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 232 guests