3.0 Litre Update

Renault & Alpine General Discussion

Moderators: eastlmark, BIG_MVS, phildini, Test Moderator, Alpineandy

User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:42 am

clee wrote:
David Gentleman wrote:
clee wrote:


So the big tooth is to make it up to 20
That diagram shows 19 teeth btw
:


No it doesn't, the big tooth is two teeth, there are 20 teeth and two missing. I can' then call the missing teeth no teeth, cos they don't exist :lol: It all still has to be counted...


A tooth is a tooth even when it's a big tooth :lol: The flywheel has 19 icle teeths + 1 big one but it makes 20 gaps :idea:


No, the big tooth is two normal teeth. Does that make the sequence only 20 teeth long, because the missing teeth don't exist?? How does the ecu look for two 'missing' teeth, when there is no gap inbetween the two missing teeth to differenciate.????

Understand? :lol:
Image
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:45 am

Image
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:03 pm

clee wrote:Image


Theres the two missing teeth! :lol: :lol:
Image
User avatar
User

peterg

Rank

Non Member

Posts

2501

Joined

Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:26 pm

Location

Cumbria


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby peterg » Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:09 pm

It works without machining the flywheel much as the standard ECU does....if it was all so very difficult the standard ECU would have the problem of teeth and gaps and other dental matters! Lee, dont machine your flywheel (I'm assuming you were taking the p when you said you already had!?) its an extra waste of money!
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:12 pm

No ...............there's the gap in the teeth :lol:
Showing a linear diagram confuses the issue as there will always one less gap than teeth :lol: :lol:
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:13 pm

peterg wrote:It works without machining the flywheel much as the standard ECU does....if it was all so very difficult the standard ECU would have the problem of teeth and gaps and other dental matters! Lee, dont machine your flywheel (I'm assuming you were taking the p when you said you already had!?) its an extra waste of money!


Take the "wee wee" !! Me :?:
User avatar
User

stephendell

Rank

Club Member

Club Member
Posts

7463

Joined

Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:25 pm

Location

London


Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Postby stephendell » Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:53 pm

I was looking back through some old emails to DTA and found this:

Existing crank wheel is actually 54 teeth, 6 gaps, 18, -2, 18, -2, 18, -2 not 54 teeth 3 gaps as stated previously. (two types available: castellated or drilled)


If correct that makes each tooth at 6 degrees and the gaps at 18 teeth intervals. 18 x 6 = 108.

Coincidence :?
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:00 pm

Yep.. 8)

End of the day it works, and shows steady RPM in the software which matches what the engine is doing. The ecu doesnt rely on each tooth/setup/angle to actaually do the fuel/ignition, its just needs a repeated reference 3 times a flywheel cycle to work from. It doesnt matter how it gets to ths point, if its regular as clock work, then its regular as clockwork....

Some flywheel on japanese motors have for instance 5 teeth only on the flywheel, ie, at 5, 18, 45, 200, and 300 degrees. Completely odd, but if you set the software up, it still fires in a regular 4 cycle pattern. Just because the teeth are in weird configurations it doesnt mean its going to fire at those times, or upset it. It just needs to see a duplicated pattern, and work from that each time as a trigger...

So basically, the ecu works out ITSSELF when to do the firing, so it can't 'go out' at high revs etc.... :roll:
Image
User avatar
User

peterg

Rank

Non Member

Posts

2501

Joined

Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:26 pm

Location

Cumbria


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby peterg » Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:53 pm

I will still be getting my flywheel machined....this new fangled ECU thing is too difficult!! :lol: :lol:
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:54 pm

stephendell wrote:I was looking back through some old emails to DTA and found this:

Existing crank wheel is actually 54 teeth, 6 gaps, 18, -2, 18, -2, 18, -2 not 54 teeth 3 gaps as stated previously. (two types available: castellated or drilled)


If correct that makes each tooth at 6 degrees and the gaps at 18 teeth intervals. 18 x 6 = 108.

Coincidence :?


'Snot correct ...............Lightened custom Ali flywheels anyone ???
http://www.cldesigns.co.uk/_vti_bin/GTA ... th%202.jpg
User avatar
User

stephendell

Rank

Club Member

Club Member
Posts

7463

Joined

Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:25 pm

Location

London


Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Postby stephendell » Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:32 pm

Great diagram :D

In that case for the GTA it's back to 66 'theoretical' teeth in a 'full' flywheel @ 5.4545 degrees per tooth.

Does the sensor trigger on the leading edge or the trailing edge?

If the sensor triggered on the trailing edge of the large tooth (which would be teeth 20 and 21 in a sequence if the gap was machined out) then there is 10.9 degrees before the sensor would pick up the trailing edge of the next tooth (tooth 1 in the next sequence). Tooth 22 would then be considered the missing tooth.

If there are three repeat sequences at 120 degree intervals then the untriggered interval = 120 - 10.9 = 109.1 degrees

108 is pretty close to 109.1 so presumably that would still work?

Has anyone tried 109 degrees in the adaptronic?
User avatar
User

Tony Smith

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1407

Joined

Fri Apr 16, 2004 4:50 pm

Location

Kent


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Its a monster!

Postby Tony Smith » Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:51 pm

My god what has my thread become! This could possibly be the least understandable thread of all time!
Alpines - GTA 3.0 Turbo, GTA 3.0 Inj (Project DD), GTA 6.2 V8 (500 bhp) , R32 Skyline GTR, BMW Alpina B10 635 Highline, Alpina B10 E39 5 Series, Jaguar 4.2 XKR, Laguna 205GT, BMW 120d.
User avatar
User

peterg

Rank

Non Member

Posts

2501

Joined

Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:26 pm

Location

Cumbria


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby peterg » Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:54 pm

Its fascintaing stuff....NOT!!!!!!! :lol: I was just happy that the thing worked on the standard flywheel.....that was enough for me! :D
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:01 pm

Peter ,knowledge is power is bhp :lol: :lol:
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:20 pm

Turn the key, drive the bloody thing... :lol:
Image
PreviousNext


  • Advertisement

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 86 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | Renault' and 'Alpine' are trademarks of Renault S.A.S. or its subsidiaries and are used with kind permission of Renault France