Cam timing

Renault & Alpine General Discussion
User avatar
User

simontaylor

Rank

Non Member

Posts

5602

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:33 pm

Location

Fleet, Hampshire


Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Postby simontaylor » Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:55 pm

I tend to disagree.
English air is colder because it is further from the equater, so being colder it is also denser. :lol: :lol:
1986 : '86 GTA v6 BW-EFR turbo, with Adaptronic ECU
Firsts at
2007 : Gurston Down & RAOC Champion
2008 : Rushmoor & Eelmoor & ACSMC Hillclimb class Champion
2009 : Longcross & Eelmoor
2010 : Crystal Palace & Eelmoor
2016 : Rushmoor & 5th O/A
no avatar
User

Alpineandy

Rank

Club Member

Club Member
Posts

2381

Joined

Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:37 am

Location

North Essex


Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Postby Alpineandy » Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:10 pm

David Gentleman wrote:but you won't get your ports near 46mm, maybe 42mm max,


What are the standard?

David Gentleman wrote:I was showing Stephen Dell the other day, the plastic intake pipe that diverts hot air into the air filter chamber on a GTA atmo,....., proving even a simple restriction removed on an standard engine makes a difference.

A310s into the airfilter are very restrictive, I guess the A310grp4 mod of having a second pipe into the airfilter would seem like a comparative 'value for money' improvement then.
Alpine A110, Renault Safrane 2.5dt, Hudson Kindred Spirit (Renault powered), transAlp (Honda) and Ducati Multistrada
User avatar
User

Stunned Monkey

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1514

Joined

Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:24 am

Location

Nr Chippenham, Wiltshire


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Postby Stunned Monkey » Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:56 pm

David Gentleman wrote: it would be possible to convert a complete Z7X engine to oddfire if you wished, and still be cheaper than modifying your heads.

.


Not without getting creative with the gudgeon pins. Odd fire engines have the pins press fitted to the rods, the even fires are all fully floating, and a different diameter
Martin - PRV Tinkerererer
www.delorean.co.uk
no avatar
User

turbo 5

Rank

Non Member

Posts

202

Joined

Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:07 pm

Location

Chepstow (near as damit!)


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby turbo 5 » Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:07 am

Andy
Heads were done by 'the best man in the buisness'.

Gas flowing is not expensive, swirl flowing is though :D total for the two heads was about 1.5k :( for all the work I had done.

Comes out like this:
Swirl flowing ins and outs- 550
Nucleus valve guides -400
Valve seat reprofile- 200
Cumbustion chamber mod- 100
Blah blah blah, say- 200
+you have to account for new valves and springs etc

In the thread polishing of ports is mentioned, that is a practice of the past, and is counter productive, ports should be 'lightly' rough this prevents fuel dropping from the atomisation as it passes through the port.

You also need to consider the whole picture, right from where the air comes in to where the exhaust gas leaves, a single restriction can undo all your good, as can a 'cave' (cave's will stall the fuel/gas flow as much as a restriction does) i.e take the talbot inlet manifolds, look good on the surface, but watch them work on a flow meter, horrible, but with a little work 'great'.

Mind you I am :) now, but only the dyno will prove the work I am doing then I may be :oops:
no avatar
User

turbo 5

Rank

Non Member

Posts

202

Joined

Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:07 pm

Location

Chepstow (near as damit!)


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby turbo 5 » Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:25 pm

Cam timing complete :D 108.5 on both.

Some hints though, always wind engine forward, backing off (by even 180 degrees) and then coming forward again seems to give up to 1 degree deviation.

Thought came about though after turning engine over for the 100th time :!: What happens to the cam timing when the engine gets hot and the chain expands,. See those french boys were clever, Variable Cam timing 10 years before them Japanese :D or maybe they were even cleverer than that, cam chain expands at same time as the engine :shock: bigger there goes the compression ratio.
User avatar
User

simontaylor

Rank

Non Member

Posts

5602

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:33 pm

Location

Fleet, Hampshire


Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Postby simontaylor » Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:59 pm

and as the engine gets hot, so the cam gears will also expand reducing the variable effect you suspect.
1986 : '86 GTA v6 BW-EFR turbo, with Adaptronic ECU
Firsts at
2007 : Gurston Down & RAOC Champion
2008 : Rushmoor & Eelmoor & ACSMC Hillclimb class Champion
2009 : Longcross & Eelmoor
2010 : Crystal Palace & Eelmoor
2016 : Rushmoor & 5th O/A
no avatar
User

MFaulks

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1552

Joined

Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:25 pm


Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 26 times

Postby MFaulks » Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:50 pm

Andy
Heads were done by 'the best man in the buisness'.

Gas flowing is not expensive, swirl flowing is though :D total for the two heads was about 1.5k :( for all the work I had done.

Comes out like this:
Swirl flowing ins and outs- 550
Nucleus valve guides -400
Valve seat reprofile- 200
Cumbustion chamber mod- 100
Blah blah blah, say- 200
+you have to account for new valves and springs etc

In the thread polishing of ports is mentioned, that is a practice of the past, and is counter productive, ports should be 'lightly' rough this prevents fuel dropping from the atomisation as it passes through the port.

You also need to consider the whole picture, right from where the air comes in to where the exhaust gas leaves, a single restriction can undo all your good, as can a 'cave' (cave's will stall the fuel/gas flow as much as a restriction does) i.e take the talbot inlet manifolds, look good on the surface, but watch them work on a flow meter, horrible, but with a little work 'great'.

Mind you I am :) now, but only the dyno will prove the work I am doing then I may be :oops:


Ooo... I must get myself some nucleus valve guides... I always knew I was missing out somewhere: lol:

Serious, what happened to this project were there any results?
... A diamond is only a piece of coal that did well under pressure... PRV afflicted, may be I need to squeeze harder!!!!

https://www.facebook.com/maftecfaulks
no avatar
User

turbo 5

Rank

Non Member

Posts

202

Joined

Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:07 pm

Location

Chepstow (near as damit!)


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby turbo 5 » Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:23 am

Car is now used regularly at hill climb events, and performs well especially considering the car is still heavy, and the driver gets increasingly heaver!

Power at the flywheel for the 2664cc engine is now just under a fraction of 200bhp and 190ft lbs. Max power reached at about 6250rpm and with a useful 150ft lbs above 2600rpm.

Gearbox, remains a pain, never keen to be hastened especially on down changes , and the final ratio remains a little high (I have a 3.69 CP ratio) so always on the lookout for a gearbox with a CP of 4.11 So if you hear of one going do let me know.
no avatar
User

MFaulks

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1552

Joined

Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:25 pm


Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 26 times

Postby MFaulks » Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:19 am

Excellent thanks for the info, do you have any power / torque graphs you can post up? What sort of transmission loss figure were you getting?

So the cam is ground on the 112 deg LCA, but advanced 4 deg to 108 deg right? I take it this is the high lift Kent grind? Did you have any valve clearance issues; I assume you are on the 44mm inlet still? Sorry loads of questions, smile... can think of a few more :D Are you running mapped ignition on this setup?
... A diamond is only a piece of coal that did well under pressure... PRV afflicted, may be I need to squeeze harder!!!!

https://www.facebook.com/maftecfaulks
no avatar
User

turbo 5

Rank

Non Member

Posts

202

Joined

Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:07 pm

Location

Chepstow (near as damit!)


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby turbo 5 » Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:33 am

Will have to dig out the graphs, away from home at moment but will try on return.

Cam's are Kevin specials so no idea on their spec bar they provide a high lift, and in my case as my CR is now 12.25/1 (we run fuel at 105+ octain) they did cause some major concerns on clearance and as whether the valves might start to kiss the pistons at high RPM (we run the engine red line at 7250), but touching wood nothing bad happened yet inspite of a tale-tale that regulary show that I exceeded the (now orange) red line with one slightly over exhuberent 7500rpm recorded!

The disty is as was, nothing trick.

Ohh one other thing, not mentioned in earlier thread, we had new choke tubes made for the 40it's up from the standard 31mm to 34mm which gave us 15bhp but increased the onset point of 'useful' torque
Previous


  • Advertisement

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 246 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | Renault' and 'Alpine' are trademarks of Renault S.A.S. or its subsidiaries and are used with kind permission of Renault France